(Refiles to fix typo in first paragraph)
By Michael Winfrey
Economics Correspondent, Central Europe and the Balkans
PRAGUE, May 13 (Reuters) - Following two decades of
unprecedented prosperity, Europe's emerging economic powers are
at a crossroads that could take some on a path to further growth
and cripple others.
From the Baltics to the Black Sea, the 10 ex-communist
states that joined the European Union since 2004 may reassess
their economic models in the face of a downturn not expected to
let up for the best off until late next year.
Other non-EU countries are also caught in the crisis but
have not embarked on the market-opening reforms required for EU
entry, putting them at a greater disadvantage for recovery.
Now those depending on International Monetary Fund-led
bailouts -- EU states Latvia, Hungary, Romania, non-members
Ukraine and Serbia, and others -- must find a way to cut state
spending as growth and budget revenues fall.
Countries in the European Union must also ask themselves how
quick they should seek to adopt the euro and whether the
export-dominated model many favour is still the most viable.
Policymakers from across the region are expected to touch on
those issues on Friday when they meet at the annual meeting in
London of regional investment institution the European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development. [] []
Another question is whether they should stick with
neo-liberal reforms once pushed by the West -- a theme that now
elicits less enthusiasm in Paris than in Prague.
"We are at a crossroads in the convergence process," said
Lars Christensen, chief economist at Danske Bank.
"Now you really are looking at the difference between
countries that have continued reforms through the 20 years and
those that have simply opened up their economies."
THREE SPEED EAST?
The EBRD sees emerging Europe contracting 5.2 percent this
year, with the biggest economy, Russia, contracting by 7.5
percent, the EU-member Baltic states all by double digits and
IMF beneficiary Ukraine by 10 percent.
"We had a disastrous Q4 2008 and a very bad Q1 2009," the
bank's President Thomas Mirow told Reuters on Tuesday. "We see
some bottoming out but it's not possible to predict anything
better than we did." []
Experts say most of the EU's eastern 10 are best off, having
left behind Soviet central planning for a market-based model.
According to Deutsche Bank, the EU members have boosted the
standard of living, measured by purchasing power parity, 50-70
percent above the level seen in 1990, just after the fall of
communism. Now it is 59 percent of the EU average.
But if there is a difference between the EU and non-EU
members, there is also a big divide between countries inside the
wealthy 27-member bloc.
Economists split those that slogged on with reforms after EU
entry from those who have coasted on a wave of foreign
investment in a decade of growth that lifted everyone regardless
of policy.
The former includes those that reined in finances and lured
foreign companies -- the Czechs, Slovaks and Poles -- but are
suffering from a collapse in demand that has crippled industry.
The other includes those like Hungary or Bulgaria, which
dragged their feet on improving the business climate, as well as
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, which used cheap borrowing to
fuel explosive growth but now face a painful slowdown.
"The countries that are in the worst situation are there
because their reform dynamics have been so weak," said Robin
Shepherd, director of international affairs at the Henry Jackson
Society thinktank. "But as a consequence of the difficulties
they are facing, it becomes even harder to do these reforms."
Those EU members that built strong industrial bases may
resume strong growth in 2011 or 2012 if demand in their main
export market, the euro zone, recovers, particularly after the
crisis hit their currencies and made them more competitive.
But the Baltics in particular will not be so lucky. Not only
have they seen a huge swing into negative growth after expanding
by more than 10 percent a few years ago, but they have also
pegged their currencies to the euro, making them more expensive.
Latvia saw its economy drop 18 percent last quarter while
Estonia on Wednesday reported an almost 16 percent contraction.
"The Q1 GDP data for the Baltics are nothing short of
horrific," said Neil Shearing, from Capital Economics.
"GDP could fall by more than 25 percent peak-to-trough,
which would rival the decline witnessed during post-Soviet
restructuring. They won't return to this year's (GDP) levels
until around 2016."
REFORMS, PLEASE
The economic crisis has shaken politics, sparking violent
protests across the region, and playing a role in the fall of
governments in Latvia, Hungary and the Czech Republic.
Despite a visible shift towards more state intervention in
the West that has included stimulus packages and bailouts for
private firms, governments in the east have mostly stuck to the
rulebook they followed on their path to joining the EU.
Latvia's new government is exploring spending cuts of up to
40 percent to get its budget deficit near the 7 percent of gross
domestic product asked for under the IMF's bailout conditions.
Romania and Hungary -- the latter long seen as a reform
laggard for refusing to tackle its bloated pension sector, among
other reforms -- have also made plans to cut significantly in
the face of falling growth and lower revenues.
Economists say those measures may be those countries' last
defence against potential default.
Some are surprised that, where governments have fallen,
political powers have chosen to install new technocrat cabinets,
despite rising public pressure for more populist policies.
The question is how long politicians will hold that line.
Most countries in the region hold elections in the next two
years, the outcomes of which hang on how long the economic
crisis will endure and whether voters are tired of reforms.
"The big danger I see is that politicians get so scared by
the public pressure for more social spending that they abandon
the reforms," said Katinka Barysch, deputy director of the
Centre for European Reform. "And that could do some medium-term
damage to the growth prospects of these countries."
(Reporting by Michael Winfrey; editing by Patrick Graham)
